18-Mar-2010
Posted by : Stephane THIRION
With this new version, Citrix give support to XenApp 6 and Microsoft Windows 2008 R2. Beware, the new Edgesight XenApp Client 5.3 is only made for Windows 2008 R2 and XenApp 6. For prior OS and XenApp version you must use the 5.2.1 version. There are a bunch of new reports available now, since Resource Manager is dead, Citrix needs to implement everything what we were use to find in RM. This is a small step but nothing big except for the licensing part, a brand new section is dedicated for licenses reporting.
What’s new ?
- Monitoring of Citrix License Servers and reporting on license usage by product group or individual products. The license servers to be monitored are specified at Configure > License Monitor Configuration > License Servers. License usage reports are available on the Track Usage tab.
Join the forum discussion on this post
10-Mar-2010
Posted by : Stephane THIRION
Citrix XenApp 6 Sets New Standard in On-Demand App Delivery for Physical and Virtual Desktops
New Release Simplifies Management, Enhances Scalability and Expands High-Definition Support for Macs, Smart Phones and Microsoft Platforms
3/10/2010 » SANTA CLARA, CA » Citrix Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CTXS), today announced Citrix® XenApp™ 6, the de facto standard for centralizing applications in the datacenter and delivering them as an on-demand service to both physical and virtual desktops. XenApp 6 offers major new enhancements that simplify computing for IT, including easier central management, enhanced enterprise scalability and seamless integration with Microsoft technologies like App-V and Windows Server 2008 R2. XenApp 6 also improves productivity for end users with extensive new high-definition HDX™ technology enhancements and simplified self-service access to apps from any device, including PCs, Macs, laptops and smart phones.
The new enhancements to XenApp 6 will also be available as an integrated feature of the company’s comprehensive desktop virtualization solution, Citrix XenDesktop™ 4. Mainstream adoption of desktop virtualization requires a proven, scalable solution with the ability to deliver any type of virtual desktop to any user on any device, and to be able to interchange delivery technologies at any time. With more than half the ROI of virtual desktops coming from centralized app management, this integration provides an unparalleled advantage over any other desktop virtualization solution on the market today. This powerful combination makes it easy for customers to deliver apps as an on-demand service to any user, on any device, across a broad range of both physical and virtual desktops.
03-Mar-2010
Posted by : Stephane THIRION
Category : Apple, Citrix, Mac OSx Snow Leopard, Secure Gateway VPX, XenApp 5, XenApp 6, XenApp Plugin, XenServer 5.5
Tags: Apple, CAG, Citrix, Citrix Access Gateway, Error 61, Mac, Mac OSx, SSL, SSL Error 61, XenApp
In this post I explain how I tried to troubleshoot this issue, if you need the solution, go at the end of this post.
My company (Activlan) had to renew our certificate installed on our Citrix Secure Gateway 3.1.3. As you might know, Citrix has issued some virtual appliance and I had to chose between, Citrix Access Gateway 4.6.2 VPX and Netscaller VPX Express (Free !). My choice was to integrate a Citrix Access Gateway (CAG) mainly because we are using other product to manage VPN to all our customers and I wanted to install what I needed, nothing less, nothing more.
So here we go, I got my xva file from MyCitrix account and I just deploy it on our XenServer, very easy, very simple, just some clicks. Once installed and basics configuration set, I had to generate the CSR (Certificate Signing Request) and wait for Verisign to send me the certificate I had to use with the CAG. This was a big adventure and of course I should have read the manual before, and configuration isn’t so easy but I guess when you do it all day long you begin to know everything and I can say now, I know how to troubleshoot a CAG from the client side to the Web Interface.
Join the forum discussion on this post
21-Feb-2010
Posted by : Stephane THIRION
Category : ArchY.net Site, Citrix, Presentation Server 4, Presentation Server 4.5, Windows 2008 R2, XenApp 5, XenApp 6
Tags: Citrix, Microsoft, Tuning Tips, Windows 2008 R2, XenApp
There are many post around to tune Citrix XenApp in many ways and there are even more to tune Microsoft Windows 2008 R2.
I want to begin a new document as we had with Citrix Metaframe 1.8 tuning tips on Microsoft Windows NT4 TSE. This was a great document and very helpfull in many way.
If you have any ideas, agree on what I will write or disagree, I take everything to form a big document available online for everyone.
First I would like to know if we should create a wiki-like to let everyone working on the document and add/change at will, what do you think ?
Which is the best way to realize Citrix XenApp tuning tips
- A wiki where everyone can add/change (69%, 9 Votes)
- A thread on the forum (31%, 4 Votes)
- By email (0%, 0 Votes)
- Another (0%, 0 Votes)
Total Voters: 13
Loading ...
If you choose other please add a comment bellow !
19-Feb-2010
Posted by : Stephane THIRION
Unattended installation is very usefull in large XenApp farm, of course if you’re deploying one server per two month you might not be interessed by this process automation but this is always interresting to know this kind of tips. Scripts bellow are example I use every day in production to install servers, of course its needs to be change and adapt to your own settings and of course if you have some ideas to share, I take it !
This unattended example assume you have only one network card enable, a local XenApp source installation file and IP address type 192.168.3 / 192.168.10 / 192.168.200 / 10.113 / 10.112. This file allow to join an existing farm named CTX_TEST with a datastore hosted on a SQL server. Finally, you need to create one folder per farm inside your XenApp source folder if you are automating multi farm setup.
Join the forum discussion on this post
16-Feb-2010
Posted by : Stephane THIRION
ArchY.net was already mobile compliant, but a bit ugly 
Not anymore ! Check this out and tell me what do you think about this new interface !
Comments !
Join the forum discussion on this post
